MODULE ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK

MODUEL EVALUATION

PRODUCT - CRITICISM

This criticism was conducted differently to previous ones. Instead of reviewing each others work, we left it in studio 4 where Amber and Simon reviewed it. This enabled them to review how well our outcomes communicated their message free from our input. I received the following feedback.

• Strong use of infographics, they are clear and communicate the information well.

• I need to choose an appropriate stock, as the stock that is used caused the text to be illegible in places. 

 Actions

• Re-produce publication and print onto an appropriate stock. 

RATIONALE - RESEARCH, COLLECT, COMMUNICATE

After presenting my ideas I received feedback from the group.

Feedback

• I could possibly present the story of Xenu along side my infographics. So I would compose illustrations of Xenu along side the graphs and charts displaying information.
• I need to think about who I would send my outcome too, and create an appropriate mailing list. Distributing my outcome to the general public would mean collecting a range of addresses. I could research into sending my outcome to a company that would then redistribute the book.
• I also need to consider how the design of the books contents reflect the information being displayed. 

HOW TO EVALUATION

KEY NOTES

• My design process could have explored more design variations.
• Communication between the group was good, meaning decisions could be made easily.
• When generating ideas people often had conflicting opinions due to different tastes in visual media, which caused some ideas to be ignored.
• We could have improved our outcome by using more appropriate printing methods and by printing onto the correct stock.